π Cycling Revenue to Fund Community Projects
Our token economy is designed as a closed-loop system where every transaction strengthens the ecosystem and directs value back into community hands. Instead of endless inflation or extractive fees, revenue from platform activity is recycled to fund projects, reward contributors, and sustain the DAO, while maintaining a balanced token supply.
π How the Cycle Worksβ
-
Bonding Curve Minting
- Community members purchase tokens via the bonding curve with fiat (or stablecoins).
- This mints new tokens while strengthening the treasury reserve, ensuring liquidity and a price floor.
-
Platform Utility
- Tokens are used to pay platform and service fees.
- These tokens flow into the treasury, creating constant demand and a natural sink for tokens.
-
Treasury Distribution
-
Treasury revenue is allocated to:
- Contributor payouts (developers, maintainers, stewards).
- Staking rewards (economic growth and stability).
- Community funding (grants, R&D, local projects, cultural initiatives).
-
-
Conversion to Fiat
- Recipients can redeem tokens for fiat, ensuring contributors, token holders, and funded projects receive real-world value.
-
Burning to Balance Supply
- A portion of redeemed tokens are returned to the treasury and burned.
- This offsets inflation, stabilizing circulating supply around a healthy band.
β Why This Model Mattersβ
- Community-first funding: Service fees directly power local projects and contributor rewards.
- Built-in sustainability: Minting is always backed by real revenue, not speculation.
- Deflationary balance: Burning ensures supply doesnβt endlessly inflate.
- Treasury strength: Every cycle grows the treasury reserve, reinforcing trust and stability.
π This design makes our token economy a regenerative engine: every transaction grows the ecosystem, funds real community initiatives, and maintains long-term stability.
Balancing token circulation with distribution and burning
The treasury will need to decide on distribution and burn factors based on current total circulation balancing circulating supply with buy and sell demand.
π Impacts a Growing Circulating Supplyβ
- Accessibility: More tokens in circulation can make it easier for new users to enter the ecosystem at lower unit prices.
- Liquidity: A larger float improves trading depth and reduces volatility.
- Active Economy: If supply is growing alongside real utility (platform fees, staking, services), it can signal expansion rather than dilution.
- Network Effects: More holders = more participants in governance, staking, and community use cases.
π Works best when: demand is also growing, so the new tokens are absorbed by real usage instead of just flooding the market.
π₯ Impacts of Distributing More and Burning Moreβ
- Scarcity Value: Burning counteracts inflation, keeping supply tighter and prices more stable or even deflationary.
- Holder Confidence: Transparent burn mechanisms reassure the community that growth wonβt endlessly dilute value.
- Price Support: Burning after buybacks creates upward pressure, especially if burns are linked to real revenues.
- Stability Band: If minting = growth, and burning = offset, supply stabilizes around a sustainable range.
π Works best when: you want to maintain value stability and link token supply directly to platform revenue.
βοΈ Trade-Offsβ
- Growing supply favors expansion and accessibility, but risks inflation and dilution if not backed by real demand.
- Burn-heavy models favor stability and long-term holders, but can limit liquidity and make tokens feel scarce for newcomers.
β Balanced Approach: Many sustainable ecosystems use cyclical models like the one youβre designing:
- Mint to match revenue and growth.
- Distribute to contributors + community.
- Burn a portion to offset inflation.
This way, circulating supply grows only in proportion to real usage, and stabilizes around a band instead of endlessly inflating.